Facts! Short and painful presented.

Here is a summary of the most important information. And do not be frightened. We list here FACTS that are NOT in the news because we want to make you think.

* Was this shutdown useful?

It is becoming increasingly clear that the countries with the most severe restrictions have the highest number of deaths per capita. Spain, Italy and France.
* Can the virus distinguish Italians from Swedes?

* Sweden has been accused of great negligence, but now they have shown that they were right. So have South Korea and Taiwan. Why does Germany, but also other countries like the US, learn nothing?

 

* Were and are Corona patients optimally treated?

In the beginning, it was thought that Corona patients absolutely had to be ventilated. Without reproach, however, more and more doctors are now doubting this therapy. See:

American doctor who first noticed the problem with ventilation.

Palliative physician for COVID-19 treatments

Danger from the ventilator?

Detailed English description

 

* Nobody points their fingers at doctors who sacrifice themselves for us every day and may have made mistakes out of ignorance. Nevertheless, it is our duty to analyze GENUESTLY, whether respiration is not possibly counterproductive with Covid-19 in many cases. All data should be processed immediately. For all patients coming to the hospital tomorrow, but also next month and next year. The earlier the better.

* How reliable are the figures of the RKI (Robert Koch Institute)?

We can now say this with 100% certainty: Catastrophic! From ??? reasons the RKI refuses to investigate WHO died of Covid-19 until today.

 

Medical examiner explains to Lanz why we don’t have a correct statistic and that he did NOT sect ONLY Corona Dead, WITHOUT a previous illness!

Why don’t Spahn and RKI want autopsies?

* Does the RKI not provide reliable figures, because otherwise it would very quickly come out that we do not have a pandemic, not even a wave of influenza like 2018

* Why is the RKI refusing to autopsy Corona Tote?

Why is there not a single mainstream journalist who notices this?

 

* Will there be a vaccine soon?

This is the question that is presented to us every day on TV and even the biggest lobbyist for vaccines, Mr. Bill Gates, is allowed to give an interview on this subject in prime time on ARD. But do we need a vaccine at all? Viruses are constantly changing, as virologists explain to us in detail EVERY YEAR, so that we get a new vaccination every year. So if the Covid-19 vaccine is not on the market for a few months, how can it help?
And what role does Prof. Drosten actually play here? Wasn’t it “purely by chance” that he received a prize from GlaxoSmithKLine in 2004 and then later “purely by chance” recommended their unnecessary swine flu vaccination? Have we learned nothing from 2009?

 

* Will there be a compulsory vaccination?

* What do you think? Will Prof. Drosten also recommend vaccination against a virus in 2020?

* Does Prof. Drosten or the Charite receive grants from the Bill Gates Foundation?

* When does it all end?

Here you can see the course of the last three influenza diseases in Germany. They do NOT differ from the previous course of Covid-19.

On average, it takes 23 days for a person to die of Covid-19! The lockdown was in Germany on March 23. So we should see a delay in deaths on April 15th. But now in Sweden, just like in Germany, we can see a significant decrease already days before. This points to the usual course of a flu season.

There is no sign of exponential growth in Sweden either! But wasn’t that THE MAIN ARGUMENT for the shutdown?

* Could it be that scientists have been completely wrong again, like with the last swine flu?

* Can it be that all the hysteria about exponential curves was just blah-blah-blah?

* What science journalist actually predicted this?

* How accurate is the test for Covid-19?

It is no longer a secret that Prof. Drosten has apparently developed a test for Covid-19 within a few days. In the meantime, however, it has turned out that this test is anything but very specific, as has always been claimed. Yes, even Prof. Drosten has now admitted this:
Or is even the study of Prof. Zhuang right, who says the test reacts to far too many viruses and is not specific at all?

And what if Dr. med. Wolfgang Wodarg, internist, pneumologist, social physician and doctor for hygiene and environmental medicine is right? Here he explains why the test is not particularly trustworthy!

* Yeah, how? Yes what? So the test can be positive or negative? Do the doctors know that too?

* Let us assume that the test is not as accurate as Prof. Drosten claims. What does it actually mean?

* How was the test actually calibrated? With German bats?

* Has the WHO tested the test?

* Does Prof. Drosten get a commission on the sale?

* Temporary final question

WHEN for God’s sake does the German government finally begin to think scientifically and act responsibly?